Malicious Criminal Allegations, Prosecution, and Organized Crime Smear Campaigns Mob Strategy Plan

Malicious Criminal Allegations, Prosecution, and Organized Crime Smear Campaigns Mob Strategy Plan

Steps:

[1] Powerful radar attacks linked to deadly cancers, lung cancer and leukemia;

[2] Malicious criminal allegations of uttering threats s.264.1 on the internet, seizure of computers and private information without warrant;

[3] The charge of uttering threats s.264.1 can be used to justify communications interception s.183;

[4] Police demand that the accused remain incarcerated for psychological assessment;

If Police Demand is Successful

[5] The accused is vulnerable to Participating Defense Lawyers at great expense while detained for assessment;

[6] The claim of powerful radar attacks, step [1] of the plan, to a prison psychiatrist during the assessment results in justifying detaining the accused until and throughout the trial proceedings at great expense and framed through Participating Defense Lawyers;

[7] The Prison Psychiatrist obtains the private medical history and provides this information in a report to the crown (police) and court;

[8] The powerful radar, step [1], and assessment order, step [4], is linked to escaping the malicious criminal allegations and prosecution through non-criminal responsibility;

Non-criminal responsibility of a crime committed, justifying and sanctioning the arrest, criminal allegations, unreasonable search and seizure, incarceration, obtaining private computer and medical information, private information that can be used in more prosecutions or were part of the setup plan and smear campaign, etc.

Psychiatric assessment, what was the state of mind of the accused at the time the alleged crime was committed?

"so, when you posted the alleged threats on the internet you claim you were also being attacked by microwaves?"

[9] Elements of a smear campaign, non-criminal responsible of uttering threats is being found not guilty of having committed a crime, uttering threats, due to mental illness;

This is entered in the police criminal system, and can be used at a later time by the police and prosecutor with other criminal allegations to justify demands of incarceration or longer incarceration;

If Police Demand is Not Successful (released under conditions)

[10] The Crown or Court demands an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility;

- The demand for fitness to stand trial is unlawful if it is granted without providing any evidence to the court by the crown, the accused has a right to challenge this evidence;

- The demand for non-criminal responsibility is supposed to be at the end of trial if the accused is found guilty, if the accused is innocent there is no need for it, if it is granted before it interferes with the accuse's defense and control of their defense; (R v Swain)

[11] Participating Defense Lawyer, the criminal code demands more requirements for the crown and court to raise the issue, and this is were a Participating Defense Lawyer can attempt to help the crown by making the demand for assessment "first to raise the issue" or sanctioning it;

[12] Granting the unlawful assessment order puts the accused on the defensive to organized crime, their use of powerful radar step [1];

The accused is vulnerable to police harassment and threats of intervention, false pretenses and justification to "intervene" to detain the accused linked to Participating Defense Lawyers, great personal expense, controlling the proceedings, preventing exposure, convicting the accused, and escape the malicious criminals allegations and prosecutions;

- "Microwaves" and the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility;

- Example, unanimous suspicious vehicle calls and threats of intervention;

[13] The threat of intervention and being detained is linked to the threat of being framed through participating lawyers at great personal expense;

[14] Police threats of intervention discourages the accused's attempts to protect themselves from powerful radar, step [1], protection and safety measures during this period of time the accused tries to defend himself from the criminal allegations;

[15]

A) The powerful radar is used in a run away strategy, "run away or get cancer", to detain run away's;

B) Conspiracy to do serious bodily harm and give a person cancer through the use of powerful radar, "die in pain" - participants, conspiracy to commit murder or attempted murder;

[16] The behavior changes by the accused to protect themselves from powerful radar is used to justify intervention and linked to threats of intervention by the police;

Behavior change examples:

Building and using shielding panels, wearing shielding materials, changes in hygiene and house keeping linked to attempts to avoid radar;

[17] More private information is obtained through communications interception during the period of malicious prosecutions and delays s. 183;

[18] The claim that a defense lawyer is actually a participant in a setup or a mob strategy plan can be interpreted as defamation;

If an accused makes this claim the prosecutor can try to setup a discussion in front of witnessing constables, and inform this defense lawyer that he has been defamed in front of a colleague and constables, which results in the accused now faced with criminal allegations and a lawsuit from a former defense lawyer.